Unicorn with delicious cookie
Our website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience.
Accept
to the top
>
>
>
V5328. OWASP. Using non-restrictive aut…
menu mobile close menu
Analyzer diagnostics
General Analysis (C++)
General Analysis (C#)
General Analysis (Java)
Micro-Optimizations (C++)
Diagnosis of 64-bit errors (Viva64, C++)
Customer specific requests (C++)
MISRA errors
AUTOSAR errors
OWASP errors (C++)
OWASP errors (C#)
OWASP errors (Java)
Problems related to code analyzer
Additional information
toggle menu Contents

V5328. OWASP. Using non-restrictive authorization checks could lead to security violations.

Apr 04 2025

The analyzer has detected a potential error related to weak user authorization verification. Granting unrestricted access to all users may lead to security vulnerabilities and unauthorized use of critical program features.

This vulnerability can be categorized under the OWASP Top 10 2021 classification as follows:

When verifying authorization, the decision-making method may deny authorization if users lack the required privileges. If the method implementation does not enforce access denial, it is insecure, making authorization verification unreliable.

For example, the vote method of the AccessDecisionVoter class always returns a positive response, even if users lack the required privileges:

@Override
public int vote(Authentication authentication, 
                FilterInvocation filterInvocation, 
                Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes
  ) {
  boolean isAdmin = hasAdminRole(authentication);
  String requestMethod = filterInvocation.getRequest().getMethod();
  if ("DELETE".equals(requestMethod) && !isAdmin) {
    return ACCESS_GRANTED;
  }
  return ACCESS_GRANTED;
}

Secure implementation should return at least one negative response:

@Override
public int vote(Authentication authentication, 
                FilterInvocation filterInvocation, 
                Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes
  ) {
  boolean isAdmin = hasAdminRole(authentication);
  String requestMethod = filterInvocation.getRequest().getMethod();
  if ("DELETE".equals(requestMethod) && !isAdmin) {
    return ACCESS_DENIED;
  }
  return ACCESS_GRANTED;
}

This diagnostic is classified as:

close form

Fill out the form in 2 simple steps below:

Your contact information:

Step 1
Congratulations! This is your promo code!

Desired license type:

Step 2
Team license
Enterprise license
** By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement
close form
Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
Free PVS‑Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
I want to join the test
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
check circle
Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you do not see the email in your inbox, please check if it is filtered to one of the following folders:

  • Promotion
  • Updates
  • Spam