To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (an extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
>
V2614. MISRA. External identifiers shou…
Analyzer diagnostics
General Analysis (C++)
General Analysis (C#)
General Analysis (Java)
Diagnosis of micro-optimizations (C++)
Diagnosis of 64-bit errors (Viva64, C++)
MISRA errors
AUTOSAR errors
OWASP errors (C#)
Additional information
Contents

V2614. MISRA. External identifiers should be distinct.

Oct 04 2021

This diagnostic rule is based on the MISRA (Motor Industry Software Reliability Association) guidelines for software development.

This rule applies only to C.

Identifiers with external linkage should be easily distinguished within the limitations imposed by the standard used:

  • before standard C99 - 6 significant characters, case-insensitive;
  • starting with standard C99 - 31 significant characters, case-sensitive.

Example 1:

//         123456789012345678901234567890123
extern int shrtfn(void);                            // OK
extern int longfuncname(void);                      // Error in C90,
                                                    // but OK in C99
extern int longlonglonglonglongfunctionname1(void); // Error in both

Long identifiers make it difficult to read code - and it's easy to confuse them with automatically generated identifiers. Also, when two identifiers differ only in characters that are not significant, this causes undefined behavior.

Some implementations of compilers and linkers can have their own limitations. To find out what these limitations are, refer to these tools' documentation.

Example 2:

//         123456789012345678901234567890123
extern int longFuncName1(int);
extern int longFuncName2(int);

extern int AAA;
extern int aaa;

void foo(void)
{
  longFuncName2(AAA);
}

This code contains several errors at once (we'll examine this code based on the C90 standard):

  • Identifiers 'longFuncName1' and 'longFuncName2' will be truncated down to the first 6 characters ('longFu'). So the linker will regard them as identical.
  • According to the C90 standard, identifiers are not always case-sensitive - so the linker can interpret identifiers 'AAA' and 'aaa' as identical as well.
  • The 'foo' function calls the 'longFuncName2' function and passes the 'AAA' variable value as its parameter. This call leads to undefined behavior because each of these two identifiers cannot be interpreted as distinct.

This diagnostic is classified as:

  • MISRA-C-5.1
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept