The analyzer detected a potential error: a nested loop is arranged by a variable which is also used in an outer loop.
In a schematic form, this error looks in the following way:
size_t i, j;
for (i = 0; i != 5; i++)
for (i = 0; i != 5; i++)
A[i][j] = 0;
Of course, this is an artificial sample, so we may easily see the error, but in a real application, the error might be not so apparent. This is the correct code:
size_t i, j;
for (i = 0; i != 5; i++)
for (j = 0; j != 5; j++)
A[i][j] = 0;
Using one variable both for the outer and inner loops is not always a mistake. Consider a sample of correct code the analyzer won't generate the warning for:
for(c = lb; c <= ub; c++)
{
if (!(xlb <= xlat(c) && xlat(c) <= ub))
{
Range * r = new Range(xlb, xlb + 1);
for (c = lb + 1; c <= ub; c++)
r = doUnion(
r, new Range(xlat(c), xlat(c) + 1));
return r;
}
}
In this code, the inner loop "for (c = lb + 1; c <= ub; c++)" is arranged by the "c" variable. The outer loop also uses the "c" variable. But there is no error here. After the inner loop is executed, the "return r;" operator will perform exit from the function.
This diagnostic is classified as:
|
You can look at examples of errors detected by the V535 diagnostic. |
Was this page helpful?
Your message has been sent. We will email you at
If you do not see the email in your inbox, please check if it is filtered to one of the following folders:
Take
a chance!