To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (standard version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
>
V6089. It's possible that the line was …
Analyzer Diagnostics
General Analysis (C++)
General Analysis (C#)
General Analysis (Java)
Diagnosis of micro-optimizations (C++)
Diagnosis of 64-bit errors (Viva64, C++)
MISRA errors
AUTOSAR errors
Additional information
Contents

V6089. It's possible that the line was commented out improperly, thus altering the program's operation logics.

Jul 27 2020

The analyzer has detected a potential error that has to do with altered execution logic due to inappropriate commenting-out of a code fragment.

This diagnostic rule looks for comments that look like regular code between the beginning of an 'if (...)' statement and its 'then' branch, with the latter having suspicious formatting. In this case, it is possible that the 'then' branch, in its current form, is a result of bad refactoring.

Consider the following example:

if (hwndTaskEdit == null) 
//  hwndTaskEdit = getTask(...);
if (hwndTaskEdit != null)
{
 ...
}

The program no longer makes sense as the condition of the second 'if' statement will never be true.

Fixed version:

// if (hwndTaskEdit == null) 
//   hwndTaskEdit = getTask(...);
if (hwndTaskEdit != null)
{
 ...
}

The analyzer doesn't generate the warning if code formatting meets the program's execution logic.

For example:

if (isReady) 
  // some comment 
  if (isSmt)
  {
   ...
  }

This diagnostic is classified as:

This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept