To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (an extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
>
V503. Nonsensical comparison: pointer &…
Analyzer diagnostics
General Analysis (C++)
General Analysis (C#)
General Analysis (Java)
Diagnosis of micro-optimizations (C++)
Diagnosis of 64-bit errors (Viva64, C++)
MISRA errors
AUTOSAR errors
OWASP errors (C#)
Additional information
Contents

V503. Nonsensical comparison: pointer < 0.

Nov 19 2010

The analyzer found a code fragment that has a nonsensical comparison. It is most probable that this code has a logic error.

Here is an example:

class MyClass {
public:
  CObj *Find(const char *name);
  ...
} Storage;

if (Storage.Find("foo") < 0)
  ObjectNotFound();

It seems almost incredible that such a code can exist in a program. However, the reason for its appearance might be quite simple. Suppose we have the following code in our program:

class MyClass {
public:
  // If the object is not found, the function
  // Find() returns -1.
  ptrdiff_t Find(const char *name);
  CObj *Get(ptrdiff_t  index);
  ...
} Storage;
...
ptrdiff_t index = Storage.Find("ZZ");
if (index >= 0)
  Foo(Storage.Get(index));
...
if (Storage.Find("foo") < 0)
  ObjectNotFound();

This is correct yet not very smart code. During the refactoring process, the MyClass class may be rewritten in the following way:

class MyClass {
public:
  CObj *Find(const char *name);
  ...
} Storage;

After this modernization of the class, you should fix all the places in the program which use the Find() function. You cannot miss the first code fragment since it will not be compiled, so it will be certainly fixed:

CObj *obj = Storage.Find("ZZ");
if (obj != nullptr)
  Foo(obj);

The second code fragment is compiled well and you might miss it easily and therefore make the error we are discussing:

if (Storage.Find("foo") < 0)
  ObjectNotFound();

This diagnostic is classified as:

You can look at examples of errors detected by the V503 diagnostic.

This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept