Our website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience.
Accept
to the top
close form

Fill out the form in 2 simple steps below:

Your contact information:

Step 1
Congratulations! This is your promo code!

Desired license type:

Step 2
Team license
Enterprise license
** By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement
close form
Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
Free PVS‑Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
check circle
Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you do not see the email in your inbox, please check if it is filtered to one of the following folders:

  • Promotion
  • Updates
  • Spam

Webinar: Evaluation - 05.12

>
>
>
V2002. Consider using the 'Ptr' version…
menu mobile close menu
Analyzer diagnostics
General Analysis (C++)
General Analysis (C#)
General Analysis (Java)
Micro-Optimizations (C++)
Diagnosis of 64-bit errors (Viva64, C++)
Customer specific requests (C++)
MISRA errors
AUTOSAR errors
OWASP errors (C++)
OWASP errors (C#)
Problems related to code analyzer
Additional information
toggle menu Contents

V2002. Consider using the 'Ptr' version of the 'foo' function here.

Dec 15 2011

This diagnostic rule was added at users' request.

The analyzer allows you to detect calls of functions that have 'Ptr' analogues. By this term we mean functions whose name has the 'Ptr' suffix. Some of these extended functions are: 'SetClassLongPtr', 'DSA_GetItemPtr'.

Consider the following source code:

void foo(int a);
void fooPtr(int a, bool b);
....
void test()
{
  foo(1); // V2002
}

In the fragment where the 'foo' function is called, the V2002 warning will be generated since there is another function with the same name but ending with 'Ptr'. The 'foo2' function does not have an alternative version and therefore no warning will be generated concerning it.

The V2002 message will be also generated in the following case:

void fooA(char *p);
void fooPtrA(char *p, int x);
....
void test()
{
  fooA(str); // V2002
}

The warning will not be generated if the call of the function with the same name comes from its extended version:

class A
{
  ....
  void foo() { .... };
  void fooPtr()
  {
    foo();  // ok
  }
  ....
};

V2001 is a related diagnostic rule.

This diagnostic is classified as: