To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (an extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
PVS-Studio 7.15: MISRA, CWE, OWASP, Unr…

PVS-Studio 7.15: MISRA, CWE, OWASP, Unreal Engine

Oct 11 2021
Author:

We are actively developing the PVS-Studio static analysis tool towards detecting Safety and Security-related errors. To be more precise, we've expanded the coverage of the MISRA C:2012 and OWASP ASVS standards. We have supported the MISRA Compliance 2020 standard. One of the more extraordinary innovations is the Best Warnings display mode. This mode displays the most significant (meaningful) warnings and can be useful when you are just starting out with the analyzer.

0872_PVS_Studio_Release_715/image1.png

Analyzer Best Warnings

We have introduced a new feature for the PVS-Studio plugin for Visual Studio. Now you can display the Best Warnings the analyzer issued for a project. In other words, these are the analyzer's most valuable warnings. They demonstrate the analyzer's capabilities for someone, who is just starting out with the analyzer.

We call this feature Analyzer Best Warnings. PVS-Studio has always been grouping analyzer warnings by 3 certainty levels. We've been traditionally using these levels to prioritize showing the analysis results — all best warnings should be first-level warnings. For the new version of our analyzer, we have developed a more accurate mechanism to evaluate warnings. Now the mechanism uses many extra criteria in addition to levels — both static (the average diagnostic "value") and dynamic. The dynamic criteria are based on warnings the analyzer issues for a specific code base (for example, detection frequency).

The Analyzer Best Warnings feature is not a substitute for working with the full report. The full report may contain other dangerous errors that need to be addressed.

In future releases, we plan to expand the capabilities of the new warning evaluation mode. We also plan to add the support of this mode to other IDE plugins and analysis integration modes. You can read more about the Analyzer Best Warnings feature in our blog and documentation.

Unreal Engine

We have improved the quality of Unreal Engine project analysis. We have additionally annotated hundreds of standard functions from Unreal Engine in the C++ PVS-Studio analyzer.

MISRA Compliance

In the report conversion utilities, we have supported the compliance report generation based on the MISRA Compliance 2020 standard. You can read more about this format and the generation of the MISRA compliance report in our blog: Why do you need the MISRA Compliance report and how to generate one in PVS-Studio?

Diagnostics

Since this release is dedicated to Safety and Security, the new diagnostics are made to expand the support of the MISRA C, AUTOSAR, and OWASP standards.

We have covered 70% of the MISRA C standard. By the end of this year, we plan to increase the coverage to 80%.

The OWASP Top 10 2017 support now covers 9 out of 10 categories. Thus, the only category left unsupported by PVS-Studio is the A9:2017 category: Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities. This category belongs to the SCA (Software Composition Analysis) tool class. In the future releases, we plan to implement SCA in the C# PVS-Studio analyzer to completely cover OWASP Top 10.

On our website, you can find PVS-Studio diagnostics classified according to the list of the most dangerous and common potential vulnerabilities (CWE Top 25).

New diagnostics (C, C++)

  • V2604. MISRA. Features from <stdarg.h> should not be used.
  • V2605. MISRA. Features from <tgmath.h> should not be used.
  • V2606. MISRA. There should be no attempt to write to a stream that has been opened for reading.
  • V2607. MISRA. Inline functions should be declared with the static storage class.
  • V2608. MISRA. The 'static' storage class specifier should be used in all declarations of object and functions that have internal linkage.
  • V2609. MISRA. There should be no occurrence of undefined or critical unspecified behaviour.
  • V2610. MISRA. The ', " or \ characters and the /* or // character sequences should not occur in a header file name.
  • V2611. MISRA. Casts between a pointer to an incomplete type and any other type shouldn't be performed.
  • V2612. MISRA. Array element should not be initialized more than once.
  • V2613. MISRA. Operand that is a composite expression has more narrow essential type than the other operand.
  • V2614. MISRA. External identifiers should be distinct.
  • V3555. AUTOSAR. The 'static' storage class specifier should be used in all declarations of functions that have internal linkage.

New diagnostics (C#)

  • V3173. Possible incorrect initialization of variable. Consider verifying the initializer.
  • V5612. OWASP. Do not use old versions of SSL/TLS protocols as it may cause security issues.
  • V5613. OWASP. Use of outdated cryptographic algorithm is not recommended.
  • V5614. OWASP. Potential XXE vulnerability. Insecure XML parser is used to process potentially tainted data.
  • V5615. OWASP. Potential XEE vulnerability. Insecure XML parser is used to process potentially tainted data.

Other enhancements

In the analyzer for C++, for large numbers, we have standardized the format for variable value range output. We have changed the text of some messages, so they may reappear in the report even though they were suppressed by the baselining mechanism. If you encounter this, please suppress these warnings again.

In the plugin for Visual Studio, you now can set shortcuts to suppress false positives and mark up warnings.

We've also optimized the C# analyzer's performance. We reduced the project preparation time before the analysis for large projects. This significantly sped up analysis. You can read more about it in our blog.

Some fresh articles in our blog

Popular related articles
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: Jul 31 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: Jan 30 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
How PVS-Studio Proved to Be More Attentive Than Three and a Half Programmers

Date: Oct 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

Just like other static analyzers, PVS-Studio often produces false positives. What you are about to read is a short story where I'll tell you how PVS-Studio proved, just one more time, to be more atte…
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: Oct 16 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
Static analysis as part of the development process in Unreal Engine

Date: Jun 27 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Unreal Engine continues to develop as new code is added and previously written code is changed. What is the inevitable consequence of ongoing development in a project? The emergence of new bugs in th…
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: Dec 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: Jan 17 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: Apr 14 2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
The way static analyzers fight against false positives, and why they do it

Date: Mar 20 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

In my previous article I wrote that I don't like the approach of evaluating the efficiency of static analyzers with the help of synthetic tests. In that article, I give the example of a code fragment…

Comments (0)

Next comments
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept