To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
>
Update on Analysis Results for CPython …

Update on Analysis Results for CPython and Ruby

Aug 11 2016
Author:

In one of our recent articles, we were comparing error density of the classical implementations of the languages Python and Ruby and made a mistake in the article itself: in the list of errors found in CPython we included errors from third-party libraries. So, we had to recheck the projects and collect the statistics anew.

0418_RubyCPythonDisclaimer/image1.png

Previous statistics

0418_RubyCPythonDisclaimer/image2.png

Some of the errors (fragments No. 2, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6) described in the previous article refer to OpenSSL. These errors affect, one way or another, every project that uses the library, including CPython, but it's incorrect to treat them as errors of the project itself. Naturally, PVS-Studio provides a mechanism for ignoring such warnings: you just need to add the directory with your externals or 3rd_party to the list of exceptions, and you won't get warnings for those directories and files anymore while they are on that list.

Details on the new check

This time we used the Linux-version of PVS-Studio, which is currently under development, to check CPython and Ruby. It works in a very simple way: you just start the build from PVS-Studio and wait until it's over. PVS-Studio tracks every compiler call, so it doesn't depend on the way the project is built. After the analysis is complete, the analyzer generates a log file.

Error density

No new errors worth mentioning were found this time. There are some errors that have to do with incorrect handling of alarm conditions: errors of this type are often found even in well tested projects because programmers don't write many tests for such situations. Here is an example of such an error found in CPython:

int
_PyState_AddModule(PyObject* module, struct PyModuleDef* def)
{
  PyInterpreterState *state;
  if (def->m_slots) {
    ....
    return -1;
  }
  state = GET_INTERP_STATE();
  if (!def)
    return -1;
  ....
}

PVS-Studio diagnostic message: V595 The 'def' pointer was utilized before it was verified against nullptr. Check lines: 286, 292. pystate.c 286

Some code fragments are just poorly formatted. There are also conditional expressions that look strange after macro expansion: for example one condition is checked several times. Generally speaking, however, everything is fine.

As for the new statistics, here they are:

0418_RubyCPythonDisclaimer/image3.png

The picture very much resembles the previous one except that it no longer includes errors from third-party libraries and an entire class of errors that refer to Windows-only code.

0418_RubyCPythonDisclaimer/image4.png

Conclusion

Few errors were found in the projects during the second check, but it's no surprise: the most critical fragments have been discussed just recently. However, static analysis should be used not only for quality control, but at the coding stage as well: finding and fixing errors at this stage is easier and cheaper.

Welcome to try PVS-Studio and apply for beta testing of the Linux-version.

Popular related articles
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: Oct 16 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: Dec 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
The way static analyzers fight against false positives, and why they do it

Date: Mar 20 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

In my previous article I wrote that I don't like the approach of evaluating the efficiency of static analyzers with the help of synthetic tests. In that article, I give the example of a code fragment…
Technologies used in the PVS-Studio code analyzer for finding bugs and potential vulnerabilities

Date: Nov 21 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

A brief description of technologies used in the PVS-Studio tool, which let us effectively detect a large number of error patterns and potential vulnerabilities. The article describes the implementati…
The Last Line Effect

Date: May 31 2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: Jan 17 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: Jul 31 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: Jan 30 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: Apr 14 2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…

Comments (0)

Next comments
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept