To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (an extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at

If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

Analyzing Samba with PVS-Studio on Linux

Analyzing Samba with PVS-Studio on Linux

Apr 04 2016

If you have followed the last developement in C/C++ static analysis tools you must have heard of PVS-Studio. I heard of them through the articles they publish on their site where they analyze open source projects. They have analyzed quite big projects including the Linux kernel, Qt, Unreal, ... and they have always managed to find crazy bugs that have been siting there for some time, undetected. Typos, bad copy-paste, undefined behaviours, non-sense code, syntax error that miraculously stills compile... As John Carmack said: "Everything that is syntactically legal that the compiler will accept will eventually wind up in your codebase".

The article is written by Aurelien Aptel. The article is published in our blog by his permission.

Unfortunately, the tool is advertized as Windows-only. The program comes in the form of a Visual Studio plugin or a separate independent program if you don't have the former. I have first used it back in 2014 on a relatively large C++ codebase used internally in the computer graphics department of my university in Lyon (LIRIS). We were using Visual Studio (which I normaly rarely use) so I thought I should give it a try. I was really pleased with the results and kept checking the PVS-Studio website for more articles.

Two years and several PVS-Studio articles later I started working on Samba. The whole project is about 2 millions lines of C code and I thought it would be a good candidate for PVS-Studio. A static analysis tool shouldn't have too many platform-specific code so I started thinking about it. The analyzer works on preprocessed code so it needs to run the preprocessor on your sources and for that it needs all your preprocessor flags, macros and includes path. Gathering this automatically can be painful. For this step I wrote a strace-based script that "spies" your build tool for compiler calls, that way it should be build-tool agnostic. You can find the latest version of this tool on github.

I sent the script to the PVS-Studio guys and after some back and forth, I was given an experimental Linux build of PVS-Studio (thanks again!). The script now covers all the analyzing process from gathering compiler flags, to analyzing, displaying and filtering the results.

Here's how you use it.

In order to not have to point to the license and binary at every use you can set up env variables.

$ export PVS_LICENSE=~/prog/pvs/PVS-Studio.lic
$ export PVS_BIN=~/prog/pvs/PVS-Studio

Go to your project directory and generate a config file for your C++11 project.

$ pvs-tool genconf  -l C++11 pvs.cfg

If you need to configure the build before building, do it. Then trace the actual build (your build command should go after the --).

$ pvs-tool trace    -- make -j8

This will output a "strace_out" file which have all the information we need. The analyze step will process that file to extract all compilation units and preprocessor flags, and run PVS-Studio on it.

$ pvs-tool analyze  pvs.cfg
pvs-tool: deleting existing log pvs.log...
001/061 [ 0%] analyzing /hom../rtags/src/ClangIndexer.cpp...
002/061 [ 1%] analyzing /hom../rtags/src/CompilerManager.cpp...
003/061 [ 3%] analyzing /hom../rtags/src/CompletionThread.cpp...
004/061 [ 4%] analyzing /hom../rtags/src/DependenciesJob.cpp...
061/061 [98%] analyzing /hom../rtags/src/rp.cpp...
pvs-tool: analysis finished
pvs-tool: cleaning output...
pvs-tool: done (2M -> 0M)

The cleaning part removes duplicated lines and will drastically reduce the file size of big results.

You can now view the results, grouped by files

$ pvs-tool view     pvs.log

The output is similar to gcc/make so it works as-is in e.g. the Emacs editor and I can use my usual builtin goto-error functions. You can disable diagnostics e.g.

$ pvs-tool view -d V2006,V2008 pvs.log

By default it only shows level 1 errors but you can change it with -l.

You can look at the -h help messsage for more.

PVS-Studio found many problems in Samba. Most of them were false positives but this is expected when you use any static analysis tool on large codebase. The important thing is it also found real bugs. I'm going to share the most interesting ones along with their fix, in the form of diffs.

- if (memcmp(u0, _u0, sizeof(u0) != 0)) {
+ if (memcmp(u0, _u0, sizeof(*u0)) != 0) {
   printf("USER_MODALS_INFO_0 struct has changed!!!!\n");
   return -1;

Here, the closing parenthesis was misplaced. The result of the sizeof comparaison was used as the compared memory size (always 1 byte). Also, we want the size of the type u0 points to, not the size of the pointer.

   handle_main_input(regedit, key);
- } while (key != 'q' || key == 'Q');
+ } while (key != 'q' && key != 'Q');

Here, we want to exit the loop on any case of the letter 'q'.

  uid = request->data.auth.uid;
- if (uid < 0) {
+ if (uid == (uid_t)-1) {
   DEBUG(1,("invalid uid: '%u'\n", (unsigned int)uid));
   return -1;

Here we tested the uid_t type for negative values.

The sign of the uid_t type is left unspecified by POSIX. It's defined as an unsigned 32b int on Linux, therefore the < 0 check is always false.

For unsigned version of uid_t, in the comparaison uid == -1 the compiler will implicitely cast -1 to unsigned making it a valid test for both signed and unsigned version of uid_t. I've made the cast explicit because less magic is better in this case.

  DEBUG(4,("smb_pam_auth: PAM: Authenticate User: %s\n", user));
- pam_error = pam_authenticate(pamh, PAM_SILENT |
-   allow_null_passwords ? 0 : PAM_DISALLOW_NULL_AUTHTOK);
+ pam_error = pam_authenticate(pamh, PAM_SILENT |
+  (allow_null_passwords ? 0 : PAM_DISALLOW_NULL_AUTHTOK));
  switch( pam_error ){
   case PAM_AUTH_ERR:
    DEBUG(2, ("smb_pam_auth: PAM: ....", user));

Simple operator priority error.

- if (check_arg_numeric("ibs") == 0 ||
-     check_arg_numeric("ibs") == 0) {
+ if (check_arg_numeric("ibs") == 0 ||
+     check_arg_numeric("obs") == 0) {
   fprintf(stderr, "%s: block sizes must be greater that zero\n",

Here the test was doing the same thing twice.

   if (!gss_oid_equal(&name1->gn_type, &name2->gn_type)) {
    *name_equal = 0;
   } else if (name1->gn_value.length != name2->gn_value.length ||
-      memcmp(name1->gn_value.value, name1->gn_value.value,
+      memcmp(name1->gn_value.value, name2->gn_value.value,
    name1->gn_value.length)) {
    *name_equal = 0;

Here memcmp was called with the same pointer, thus comparing the same region of memory with itself.

  ioctl_arg.fd = src_fd;
  ioctl_arg.transid = 0;
  ioctl_arg.flags = (rw == false) ? BTRFS_SUBVOL_RDONLY : 0;
- memset(ioctl_arg.unused, 0, ARRAY_SIZE(ioctl_arg.unused));
+ memset(ioctl_arg.unused, 0, sizeof(ioctl_arg.unused));
  len = strlcpy(, dest_subvolume,
  if (len >= ARRAY_SIZE( {

Here memset was given the size as a number of elements instead of a byte size.

  if (n + IDR_BITS < 31 &&
-     ((id & ~(~0 << MAX_ID_SHIFT)) >> (n + IDR_BITS))) {
+     ((id & ~(~0U << MAX_ID_SHIFT)) >> (n + IDR_BITS))) {
   return NULL;

Using negative values on the left-side of a left-shift operation is an Undefined Behaviour in C.

  if (cli_api(cli,
        param, sizeof(param), 1024, /* Param, length, maxlen */
-       data, soffset, sizeof(data), /* data, length, maxlen */
+       data, soffset, data_size, /* data, length, maxlen */
        &rparam, &rprcnt,   /* return params, length */
        &rdata, &rdrcnt))   /* return data, length */

Here data used to be a stack allocated array but was changed to a heap allocated buffer without updating the sizeof use.

   goto query;
- if ((p->auth.auth_type != DCERPC_AUTH_TYPE_NTLMSSP) ||
-     (p->auth.auth_type != DCERPC_AUTH_TYPE_KRB5) ||
-     (p->auth.auth_type != DCERPC_AUTH_TYPE_SPNEGO)) {
+ if (!((p->auth.auth_type == DCERPC_AUTH_TYPE_NTLMSSP) ||
+       (p->auth.auth_type == DCERPC_AUTH_TYPE_KRB5) ||
+       (p->auth.auth_type == DCERPC_AUTH_TYPE_SPNEGO))) {

Prior to this fix, the condition was always true and the function always returned "access denied".


Py_RETURN_NONE is a macro that hides a return statement. In this python binding many functions were returning before freeing heap allocated memory. This problem was present in dozens of functions.

  int i;
- for (i=0;ARRAY_SIZE(results);i++) {
+ for (i=0;i<ARRAY_SIZE(results);i++) {
   if (results[i].res == res) return results[i].name;
  return "*";

Here the for condition was always true.

 int create_unlink_tmp(const char *dir)
+ if (!dir) {
+  dir = tmpdir();
+ }
  size_t len = strlen(dir);
  char fname[len+25];
  int fd;
  mode_t mask;
- if (!dir) {
-  dir = tmpdir();
- }

Here the dir pointer was used before the null-check.

Overall I'm really pleased with PVS-Studio and I would recommend it. Unfortunately it's not officially available on Linux. Although you can just contact them if you're interested it seems :)

Popular related articles
Technologies used in the PVS-Studio code analyzer for finding bugs and potential vulnerabilities

Date: Nov 21 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

A brief description of technologies used in the PVS-Studio tool, which let us effectively detect a large number of error patterns and potential vulnerabilities. The article describes the implementati…
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: Dec 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: Jan 30 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: Jan 17 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: Apr 14 2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…
Static analysis as part of the development process in Unreal Engine

Date: Jun 27 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Unreal Engine continues to develop as new code is added and previously written code is changed. What is the inevitable consequence of ongoing development in a project? The emergence of new bugs in th…
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: Jul 31 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…
The Last Line Effect

Date: May 31 2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: Oct 16 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…

Comments (0)

Next comments
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →