To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at

If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

Issues in real programs - what errors a…

Issues in real programs - what errors are not there in the world...

Dec 10 2009

When testing the analyzer PVS-Studio on one of the projects we found an interesting error. This error does not refer to the topic of 64-bits although its consequences are diagnosed as 64-bit problems. But this error attracts attention due to its unusual character and we decided to describe it in the blog.

Here is the code of a program that, as the author had intended, was to print the value of the matrix items into the internal structure.

Matrix3 m;
TextOutput &t = ...;
t.printf("%10.5f, %10.5f, %10.5f,\n%10.5f,"
  "%10.5f, %10.5f,\n%10.5f, %10.5f, %10.5f)",
  m[0, 0], m[0, 1], m[0, 2],
  m[1, 0], m[1, 1], m[1, 2],
  m[2, 0], m[2, 1], m[2, 2]);

Of course, this code is incorrect although compiles well. It seems that the author, while developing the code, had been distracted by work on a project in a different language and therefore confused the syntaxes. As a result, the expressions of the type "1, 2″ have the value of the subexpression after the last comma according to C++ language rules. I.e. the expression "1, 2″ equals 2.

As a result, the given code is equivalent to this:

Matrix3 m;
TextOutput& t = ...;
t.printf("%10.5f, %10.5f, %10.5f,\n%10.5f,"
  "%10.5f, %10.5f,\n%10.5f, %10.5f, %10.5f)",
  m[0], m[1], m[2],
  m[0], m[1], m[2],
  m[0], m[1], m[2]);

Matrix3 class has an overloaded operator [] that returns the pointer to float type:

inline const float* operator[] (int iRow) const;

Of course, it does not matter at all to the function printf what to take as arguments: float or float*. The project compiles with the warning level /W3 and the compiler keeps silent when it comes to these suspicious constructs. To make Visual C++ generate the warning you should raise the warning level up to /W4. Then you will see the diagnostic warning "warning C4709: comma operator within array index expression".

PVS-Studio analyzer does not like this code too but due to a different reason. The expression "m[0]" has "float *" type, i.e. memsize-type and is an argument for the function with a variable number of arguments. The analyzer considers that this code can potentially contain errors and generates the diagnostic warning "error V111: Call function 'printf' with variable number of arguments. Second argument has memsize type."

Popular related articles
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: Dec 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: Jul 31 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: Apr 14 2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
How PVS-Studio Proved to Be More Attentive Than Three and a Half Programmers

Date: Oct 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

Just like other static analyzers, PVS-Studio often produces false positives. What you are about to read is a short story where I'll tell you how PVS-Studio proved, just one more time, to be more atte…
The way static analyzers fight against false positives, and why they do it

Date: Mar 20 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

In my previous article I wrote that I don't like the approach of evaluating the efficiency of static analyzers with the help of synthetic tests. In that article, I give the example of a code fragment…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: Jan 30 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: Oct 16 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
Static analysis as part of the development process in Unreal Engine

Date: Jun 27 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Unreal Engine continues to develop as new code is added and previously written code is changed. What is the inevitable consequence of ongoing development in a project? The emergence of new bugs in th…
The Last Line Effect

Date: May 31 2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…

Comments (0)

Next comments
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →