To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (an extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at

If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

Why you should run static code analysis…

Why you should run static code analysis regularly and not from time to time (for instance, at "each release")

Apr 12 2011

While developing and helping people to use static code analyzers, we constantly encounter an inefficient approach to using these tools. Developers would launch the tool, find and fix interesting software errors and then launch the tool only from time to time, for instance, when a new version is released. This approach is destined to fail. I will tell you why.

In general, the most complicated and "heavy-going" stage in the process of using tools of static code analysis is their integration. The point is that any static analyzer always generates rather many messages (including false alarms) and you will anyway get plenty of these messages at first launches. You must somehow "force your way through" them - either fix errors in code or mark them as false alarms. This way or another, you must make the analyzer not generate these messages anymore. After that users often put the tool aside till "the next time", say, till preparing a new version of their products.

It is not right because again too many analyzer-generated messages will accumulate and you will feel reluctant to fix them. A correct way of using a static code analyzer is to run it regularly and fix detected issues at once. For instance, you may run static analysis nightly together with night builds.

There is another more crucial reason why irregular launch of a static analyzer is too inefficient. Most errors that could be detected by static code analysis at once are detected with the help of other testing methods instead. The cost and time of error fixing rise several times.

PVS-Studio has a mechanism that allows you to run code analysis from the command line. This method of launching the tool is very convenient to integrate into the procedure of night builds. In this case, all the project's files will be checked and at morning you may study the report with new errors found.

If analysis of all the files takes too much time (it is typical of large projects), you may set PVS-Studio to check only some files. Here you may read how to do that. In brief, you may either check files modified during the last day (or several days) or check only files specified in the list (the list itself is a file defined in the command line). In this case, first, you will get a list of new issues found in code every morning and, second, it will take you quite little time. The "Check only Files Modified In" setting might be useful when launching PVS-Studio manually while writing the code. For instance, having finished modification of a large program's fragment and made the code compile well, you may run PVS-Studio. The analyzer will quickly check only those files which have been modified today.

Popular related articles
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: Jul 31 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…
How PVS-Studio Proved to Be More Attentive Than Three and a Half Programmers

Date: Oct 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

Just like other static analyzers, PVS-Studio often produces false positives. What you are about to read is a short story where I'll tell you how PVS-Studio proved, just one more time, to be more atte…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: Jan 30 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: Jan 17 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
The way static analyzers fight against false positives, and why they do it

Date: Mar 20 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

In my previous article I wrote that I don't like the approach of evaluating the efficiency of static analyzers with the help of synthetic tests. In that article, I give the example of a code fragment…
The Last Line Effect

Date: May 31 2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: Dec 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
Static analysis as part of the development process in Unreal Engine

Date: Jun 27 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Unreal Engine continues to develop as new code is added and previously written code is changed. What is the inevitable consequence of ongoing development in a project? The emergence of new bugs in th…
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: Oct 16 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…

Comments (0)

Next comments
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →