To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (standard version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
>
Is there a way to make the type size_t …

Is there a way to make the type size_t 32-bit in a 64-bit program?

Jan 23 2012
Author:

While porting code from a 32-bit system to a 64-bit one, you may want to make the types size_t/ptrdiff_t 32-bit again to reduce the number of errors and warnings generated by the compiler. This wish is usually justified by the supposition that the program will not have to deal with much memory and many objects.

Here is an instance of such a dispute on the forum: "Can use 32 bit size_t in x64 VC2008 STL?".

This is a brief answer to begin with: you must not and should not think that way. Concentrate on correcting errors and warnings. There are a lot of reasons for this answer. Here are some of them.

Suppose you managed to redefine the type size_t as a 32-bit one in your code by resorting to some tricks (typedef, #define). Then:

1) The code will become incompatible with libraries built with the size_t of the standard size.

2) You will get more errors. For example:

#define size_t unsigned
void Errors(void *ptr, CArray<int> &arr)
{
  size_t a = (size_t)ptr;
  ptr = (void *)a; //Invalid pointer
  //Infinity loop if array size > UINT_MAX
  for (size_t i = 0; i != arr.GetSize(); i++)
    arr[i] = 0;
}

3) Many operations will lead to warnings and become potentially incorrect. For example:

#define size_t unsigned
void A(float *p1, float *p2)
{
  size_t s = p1 - p2; //Warning C4244
}

Let us summarize. You should not try to "hack" the types size_t/ptrdiff_t and change their sizes. You might need more person-hours to solve the problem of linking your code with libraries and correcting new errors and compiler-generated warnings than to perform refactoring of the code to provide it with the full 64-bit support. Resorting to such a "hacking" you are risking to bring a lot of hidden defects into the code that will be difficult to detect for a long time. For example, a code where a pointer is stored in a 32-bit integer variable may work quite well for a long time while the pointer refers to an object lying inside the four low-order Gbytes of memory. But the object may be created outside these four low-order Gbytes at any point. And this is most likely to happen while you are actively exploiting the program rather than testing it.

Please, read the articles in the references section to learn more on the topic.

References

Popular related articles
The way static analyzers fight against false positives, and why they do it

Date: Mar 20 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

In my previous article I wrote that I don't like the approach of evaluating the efficiency of static analyzers with the help of synthetic tests. In that article, I give the example of a code fragment…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: Jan 17 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
How PVS-Studio Proved to Be More Attentive Than Three and a Half Programmers

Date: Oct 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

Just like other static analyzers, PVS-Studio often produces false positives. What you are about to read is a short story where I'll tell you how PVS-Studio proved, just one more time, to be more atte…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: Jan 30 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
The Last Line Effect

Date: May 31 2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
Static analysis as part of the development process in Unreal Engine

Date: Jun 27 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Unreal Engine continues to develop as new code is added and previously written code is changed. What is the inevitable consequence of ongoing development in a project? The emergence of new bugs in th…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: Apr 14 2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: Dec 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: Jul 31 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…

Comments (0)

Next comments

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept