To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (standard version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

/Wp64

March 31, 2013

/Wp64 (Detect 64-Bit Portability Issues) is the key of Visual C++ compiler. The key appeared in Visual Studio 2003 and was intended for preparing migration of applications on 64-bit systems. In Visual Studio 2008 /Wp64 key is considered obsolete for it is high time we began to compile 64-bit applications and not to prepare for them.

When defining /Wp64 key the compiler detects some potential errors which can occur when compiling C/C++ code for 64-bit systems. Test of the code consists in that the types marked by the key word __w64 in 32-bit code are interpreted as 64-bit types during the test.

For example, we have the following code:

typedef int MyInt32;
#ifdef _WIN64
  typedef __int64 MySSizet;
#else
  typedef int MySSizet;
#endif
void foo() {
  MyInt32 value32 = 10;
  MySSizet size = 20;
  value32 = size;
}

"value32 = size;" expression on a 64-bit system will cause value cutoff and, consequently, to a potential error. We want to diagnose it. But when compiling a 32-bit application everything is correct and we won't get a warning message.

To prepare for 64-bit systems we should add /Wp64 key and insert the key word __w64 when defining MySSizet type in a 32-bit version. As the result we have the following code:

typedef int MyInt32;
#ifdef _WIN64
  typedef __int64 MySSizet;
#else
  typedef int __w64 MySSizet; // Add __w64 keyword
#endif
void foo() {
  MyInt32 value32 = 10;
  MySSizet size = 20;
  value32 = size; // C4244 64-bit int assigned to 32-bit int
}

Now we'll get the warning message C4244 which will help us to prepare for porting the code on a 64-bit platform.

You should understand that /Wp64's abilities are rather limited. A more detailed and specialized code test can be performed by the commercial tool Viva64 developed specially for simplifying port of applications on 64-bit systems.

References

Popular related articles
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: 12.22.2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: 04.14.2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: 10.16.2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: 01.17.2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: 05.19.2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
How PVS-Studio Proved to Be More Attentive Than Three and a Half Programmers

Date: 10.22.2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

Just like other static analyzers, PVS-Studio often produces false positives. What you are about to read is a short story where I'll tell you how PVS-Studio proved, just one more time, to be more atte…
The way static analyzers fight against false positives, and why they do it

Date: 03.20.2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

In my previous article I wrote that I don't like the approach of evaluating the efficiency of static analyzers with the help of synthetic tests. In that article, I give the example of a code fragment…
The Last Line Effect

Date: 05.31.2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: 01.30.2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
Static analysis as part of the development process in Unreal Engine

Date: 06.27.2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Unreal Engine continues to develop as new code is added and previously written code is changed. What is the inevitable consequence of ongoing development in a project? The emergence of new bugs in th…

Comments (0)

Next comments

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept