To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (standard version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at

If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

The warnings C4311 and C4312 generated …

The warnings C4311 and C4312 generated by the compiler when using the /Wp64 switch

March 11, 2012

C4311 and C4312 are ones of the most frequent warnings generated by the compiler for 32-bit code not adapted for migration to 64-bit platforms. They are generated only when you use the /Wp64 key (detecting 64-bit portability issues) intended to prepare migration of applications to 64-bit systems.

Note that the /Wp64 parameter is announced deprecated beginning with Visual C++ 9.0 since the time "to prepare for 64-bit code" has passed.

The C4311 and C4312 warnings tell you about an attempt to put a pointer into a 32-bit variable or vice versa. In a 64-bit system, these conversions are incorrect. If the code is compiled on the 64-bit platform, the pointer's value (64 bits) will be truncated if it is assigned to a variable of the int type (32 bits). This is an example of code that causes the C4311 and C4312 warnings:

   int *p;
   int a = (int)p; //C4311
   p = (int *)a; //C4312

To correct the code you should use memsize-types that can store a pointer, for instance size_t, ptrdiff_t, intptr_t, LONG_PTR, etc. This is an example of correct code:

   int *p;
   INT_PTR b = (INT_PTR)p; //OK

See the "Development of 64-bit C/C++ applications" course for detailed recommendations on creating safe 64-bit code.

If a program being developed has a short life-cycle and you do not plan to port it to the 64-bit platform, you may eliminate these warnings by disabling the /Wp64 option in the compiler settings.

Note that the /Wp64 switch carries out a rather superficial analysis and detects only crudest errors. To perform a complete analysis of your code, we recommend you to use the specialized static code analyzer Viva64 included into the PVS-Studio package. See the article "Comparing capabilities of PVS-Studio and Visual Studio 2010 in detecting defects in 64-bit programs" for comparison of diagnostic abilities of Visual C++ and Viva64.


Popular related articles
The Last Line Effect

Date: 05.31.2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
How PVS-Studio Proved to Be More Attentive Than Three and a Half Programmers

Date: 10.22.2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

Just like other static analyzers, PVS-Studio often produces false positives. What you are about to read is a short story where I'll tell you how PVS-Studio proved, just one more time, to be more atte…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: 01.17.2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: 05.19.2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
Static analysis as part of the development process in Unreal Engine

Date: 06.27.2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Unreal Engine continues to develop as new code is added and previously written code is changed. What is the inevitable consequence of ongoing development in a project? The emergence of new bugs in th…
Technologies used in the PVS-Studio code analyzer for finding bugs and potential vulnerabilities

Date: 11.21.2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

A brief description of technologies used in the PVS-Studio tool, which let us effectively detect a large number of error patterns and potential vulnerabilities. The article describes the implementati…
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: 07.31.2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…
The way static analyzers fight against false positives, and why they do it

Date: 03.20.2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

In my previous article I wrote that I don't like the approach of evaluating the efficiency of static analyzers with the help of synthetic tests. In that article, I give the example of a code fragment…
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: 10.16.2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: 04.14.2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…

Comments (0)

Next comments

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →