To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
>
Integrating PVS-Studio into uVision Keil

Integrating PVS-Studio into uVision Keil

Aug 03 2021
Author:

I develop software for embedded systems (mostly for STM32 and Milandr). As the main IDE, I use uVision Keil. As long as I write in C and C++, I've been wondering whether I write code the right way. Can I write it that way?

0847_Integrating_PVS-Studio_into_uVision_Keil/image1.png

This article was published on habr.com. It was copied and translated with the author's permission.

Introduction

Well, my code does compile. But it's C++, where "program is ill-formed, no diagnostic required" is ok.

For several years, I've been bothering my higher-ups asking to buy a PVS-Studio license. Unexpectedly my request coincided with an urgent need to spend money on new software. Finally, we bought a PVS-Studio license!

On the one hand, I was overjoyed. But on the other hand, I faced some difficulties integrating PVS-Studio into Keil. PVS-Studio is integrated into Visual Studio (this pleased our department that develops for desktops) and JetBrains products (CLion, Rider, Idea, Android Studio) right away. PVS-Studio also provides ready-to-use scripts to integrate into some other build systems. As for Keil, PVS-Studio supports only compilers. So, we needed someone to integrate PVS-Studio into Keil. Who's going to do that? Well, since that was my idea...

Obviously, I still had to do my usual tasks, so the integration process was put off. At first, regardless of all recommendations, I was checking projects "only on holidays", without any automation. I used the universal scenario – run PVS-Studio Standalone, click "Start compiler monitoring", compile the project, and view the analysis results.

I've been using this scenario until one day I spent 3 days debugging a very unpleasant bug. The bug appearances were random and bewildering. It turned out to be a banal null pointer dereference (which on microcontrollers usually does not result in any instantaneous errors like Access Violation).

I quickly realized that PVS-Studio detects this bug. That was the final nail in the coffin of my patience! – and started integrating PVS-Studio into Keil.

Now let me explain what I mean by integration:

  • the analysis runs automatically after clicking "Compile"
  • the analyzer automatically displays the analysis report, ideally the report should be displayed in the same window where common compile errors are displayed
  • a double-click on an error or a warning automatically jumps to the corresponding line

At the end of the article, you'll know that almost everything we needed, we made happen – but with some changes :)

First naive attempt

As far as I know, Keil does not provide any "usual" ways of customization such as plugins or extensions. So, the only way to integrate into the build is Custom Build Steps, which are called "User Scripts" in Keil.

In project options, there's the Users tab that allows running third-party programs (only .bat or .exe, there's no even .cmd!) for three events:

  • before the entire project build
  • before compiling each file
  • after the entire project build

The first and the last events seem to be enough. The plan looks simple:

  • start monitoring before the entire project build
  • stop monitoring after the build
  • run the analysis
  • output the results to the Build Output window

Quick experiments showed that Build Output (as expected) catches all the output in stout and stderr for user scripts. Although Build Output doesn't show the Cyrillic alphabet at all, that's why errors in these scripts turn into unreadable scrawls. I used a duct tape and replaced the code page with an English one, so the errors were issued in English.

Okay, let's point out the main steps.

  • Start monitoring using the CLMonitor console utility.
  • After the build is completed, run the analysis and save results in text format.
  • Output the results with more.
  • Ta-da! Looks like everything works.

Luckily (or maybe PVS-Studio developers did it on purpose), warning lines format in PVS-Studio is the same as in Keil. That's why, I managed to jump to the line with error by double-clicking.

So, is that the end of the story?

Unfortunately, no.

After a while, I noticed a strange thing – I'm rebuilding the same project without any changes, but the results of the PVS-Studio analysis are different! An error kept appearing and disappearing in one of the files.

An epic e-mail thread with technical support began. It lasted for almost a year (!), however, it was totally my fault. Honestly, PVS-Studio has the best technical support I've ever met. Believe me, I contacted many technical supports – from Russian chip makers, who congratulated me on "Raspberry Jam Pie Day" (no, I'm not joking) to the largest foreign companies, that kept sending me from one person to another for months :)

I must confess that I replied less frequently than PVS-Studio support... because I still had my job duties. However, it only partially justifies me.

Anyway, the problem was clear – there is no magic wand to monitor compiler runs. If the compiler rapidly compiled a file, PVS-Studio might skip its run. Undoubtedly, "rapidly" is a relative term. The compile time depends on environment variables, the number of background processes, and so on. Apparently, the key element is running build in parallel. If the parallel build is enabled, PVS-Studio is highly likely to skip a run. If the parallel build is disabled, PVS-Studio does not skip runs. At least, working with several projects, I didn't notice such behavior on my computers.

Okay. What should I do about it?

Solution search

Brute-force method

The brute-force method is to disable the parallel build (at least, sometimes; to run the analysis). It's a bad choice, because:

  • In Keil, the parallel build is disabled not for each project individually but for all projects at once; that is, builds of all projects are slowed down.
  • The build time slows down significantly. Of course, someone finds 1.5-2 minutes insignificant, and yet, it's disturbing. You can't help but pay attention to time and lose focus. If we choose to disable the parallel build in some cases, we're getting back to checking projects "only on holidays". But we don't want that.

Parsing project file

Let's move on. Soon I realized that it was silly to use monitoring. The project file contains all the necessary information – which files are compiled, which keys are used, and so on. Why don't we just parse this file?

This solution looks good in name only. It's not clear, who should do this parsing. Indeed, we bought the license, but we can't endlessly exploit PVS-Studio tech support. For them, our Keil issue is not a high priority one. Its integration requires lots of efforts and time. PVS-Studio deals with many client's requests, therefore it is unprofitable to integrate into every environment. That is why PVS-Studio suggests a universal monitoring solution.

Besides, although the project is in xml format, it is closed. So, a vendor can introduce significant and unpredictable changes at any time.

Also, as I understand, it's not enough to analyze the information just in the project file.

Batch file

Keil provides a weird feature – creating a project batch file. I still don't know the purpose of this feature. This batch file contains all the necessary information for PVS-Studio, and it's enabled with a single check mark!

Unfortunately, this check mark also breaks the incremental build. That is, any compilation becomes a complete recompilation. It affects the build time, so, unfortunately, it's not an option for us.

Slowing down compilation

If monitoring can't catch compiler run, let's just make compiler run longer!

  • We may run Process Explorer with Keil. But it is unclear how much does it help and why does it work?
  • One of my colleagues enjoyed template programming. So, I asked him to create something to heavily load up the compiler without affecting the binary file; he gave me a template calculating the sine table. I won't show you that because I don't want to horrify noble audience (and also because I didn't write that code :)

The --preinclude flag forcibly included the template calculation in each cpp-file in the project.

I didn't use these solutions because they slow down compilation (and also because it's cringey).

Eventually, we have two options left. They are not perfect. Both options have pros and cons. But, as they say, the perfect is the enemy of the good.

Dump

The first option is not to monitor the compilation every time we run the analysis. It is enough to get a set of compiled files. This set is rarely changed – only when new files are added to the project (or when old files are removed).

Thus, this option has two stages:

  • detect that the set of files in the project has changed; in this case, start monitoring and save the monitoring result (not the analysis result)
  • if the set of files has not changed, run the analysis on the saved result

How to detect changes in the list of files? Certainly, there are different ways. The first idea that came to my mind was to use git since all projects must be gitted.

If the project file has been changed since the last commit, the project file contains new files!

Many things may be changed in the project file because it contains compilation options and lots of other stuff. So, I wrote the following line:

was_changed=$(git diff *.uvproj* | grep "[+,-]\s*<FileName>" \
                                 | sed -e 's#</*FileName>##g')

Do you remember, I said earlier that it's better not to parse a closed and undocumented format? Well, forget it :D

Or we can just monitor all changes in the project file without delving into details; thus, we'll have more false-positive warnings, but not false-negative ones.

Okay, we realized that the set of files has changed – how to start monitoring?

Here I have not come up with anything better than to issue a warning to the user and ask to do the following:

  • Disable the parallel build (click Edit->Configuration->Other and select the Disable parallel build checkbox)
  • Change the "common" scripts to "monitoring" — remove and select two more options in Options->User
  • Completely rebuild the project
  • Reselect all the checkboxes

The disadvantages of this approach:

  • Lots of manual tinkering when the set of files changes. Despite the fact that files are rarely added to the project, it's still annoying.
  • Here we implicitly hope that disabling parallel build is enough to accurately monitor errors.
  • If the project has several build configurations (called "Targets" in Keil), it may be necessary to regenerate dump when switching – if configurations have different files, different compilation keys, different defines are active, etc. Unfortunately, we can't automatically pull the name of the current configuration from Keil (well, at least I couldn't find how to do that). That's why we have to keep an eye on build configurations.

Some less interesting details:

  • To track the changes, we need git, bash, and sed. Luckily, all these are included in the git for Windows; but the script usage is limited. Moreover, to track file changes via git, the project must be in the repository; we can't check an arbitrary folder.
  • Since Keil can run only .bat and .exe, we have to wrap the shell script in a .bat file.
  • Git can be installed anywhere, or you can add it to Path. To cover both cases, I came up with this weird alternative: "%GIT_BASH_PATH%bash.exe". If Path contains the path to bash.exe, it's going to work out. Alternatively, you can create the GIT_BASH_PATH environment variable without cluttering up the global Path. You only need to put a slash at the end of GIT_BASH_PATH.
  • The same is with PVS-Studio
  • If the project is not compiled, clmonitor can remain running. We must not forget to stop it when starting compilation. It means that we can't compile two projects at once collecting dumps. But I didn't want to do it anyway.

To collect a dump, we use the following path:

CLMonitor.exe save Dump -d "path_to_dump\pvs_dump.zip"

When we already have the dump, the analysis starts as follows:

CLMonitor.exe analyzeFromDump -d "path_to_dump\pvs_dump.zip" 
                              -l "path_to_result\pvs.plog"  
                              -t "path_to_config\pvs_settings.xml" 
                              -c "path_to_config\ignore_warnings.pvsconfig"

PlogConverter.exe "path_to_result\pvs.plog" --renderTypes=Txt
                                               -o "path_to_result"

more "path_to_result\pvs.plog.txt"

pvs_settings.xml and ignore_warnings.pvsconfig configs allow you to suppress warnings. I'll explain it in detail later.

The purpose of these actions is to obtain the result from the dump, render it into text, and output a text file to the terminal. As I mentioned, the output format is the same as Keil expects. So, double-clicking on a warning works :)

CLMonitorDumpFilter utility

It's inconvenient to do everything manually. After I discussed possible solutions with the PVS-Studio team, they developed a special utility and several scripts for us.

Here's the main idea:

  • Run the script before the build (with one set of parameters) to form a dump of the environment, compilation keys, etc. This run creates a copy of the project file, enables the Batch file, builds the project, analyzes the batch file, and deletes the copy.
  • Run the script before each file is compiled instead of monitoring compiler runs.
  • Run the script (with a different parameter) after project's build to run the analysis and output the result.

The main script is long. I won't copy-paste it here (but here's the link to it on github); besides, the PVS-Studio team offered me the script :) I changed it a little and removed the necessity to manually specify the path to the Keil folder.

The calls in this case look as follows:

  • Before Compile .\scripts\_before_compile.bat #X #E
  • Before Build/Rebuild .\scripts\_before_build_dump.bat #X #P "Target 1"

Here "Target 1" is the name of your current target, it must be quoted

  • After Build .\scripts\_after_build.bat #X #P

Letters with hashes – called "Key Sequence" in Keil — are build variables, environment variables for the build.

  • #X – the path to the Keil folder,
  • #E – the path to the current file
  • #P – the path to the project file

The advantages of this approach compared to the previous one:

  • No recurrent mandatory manual actions required. We just need to organize some environment variables.
  • We don't just hope to have error-free monitoring. The script "controls" every compiler run

Cons:

  • Currently there is no support for ARM Compiler version 6 (i.e. armclang)
  • The name of the current configuration must be manually specified in the script line.

This is a disadvantage only in comparison with the previous approach, where we don't need to specify the name :) Fortunately, you have to do it only once, when creating the configuration, but you have to do it manually.

  • The Build Output window is filled with messages
0847_Integrating_PVS-Studio_into_uVision_Keil/image3.png

I couldn't remove these messages :(

Since Keil does not provide usual "Errors" window, as in most other IDEs, you have to constantly read the Build Output window. It is impossible to filter these messages. These messages clutter compiler output and make it hard to find compilation errors and warnings.

  • Since the special utility works with the project file, after compilation Keil decides that the project file has changed and suggests restarting the project. If you accept it, all the messages in Build Output (including analysis results) disappear.

Luckily, we don't have to run the script each time before the compilation of each file. We run it only if the set of compiled files has changed. But we again must select and deselect checkboxes manually! It looks like the previous approach—we still have to select and deselect checkboxes but in one place, not in two.

So, this integration is not perfect, but it's better than nothing.

Suppressing warnings

Since we discuss integration, I should mention different ways to suppress warnings. You can find all the necessary information on the PVS-Studio website. Here, I'll try to briefly describe the suppression mechanism. I'll skip some options since I don't use them.

So, you can suppress warnings on several levels:

How the warnings are suppressed

When to use

Suppress one specific warning for one specific line

If you are sure, it's not an error

Suppress all warnings for a folder in the current project

If we have a library in the project folder

Suppress a class of warnings for the current project

If this analysis class doesn't work anyway

Suppress specific types of warnings in the current project

For warnings that usually do not correspond to actual errors, but are issued constantly

Suppress specific folders on the computer

For constantly used libraries outside the project folder

Embedded systems help you to make each project self-sufficient (i.e., the project does not depend on any external libraries, you just clone it, and it compiles). I wanted to keep this self-sufficient approach. Therefore, all scripts for analysis and files for warnings suppression must be stored in the project folder (obviously, you have to install PVS-Studio separately).

Suppress one specific warning for one specific line

Just write a comment before the certain line or on the right of it. The comment looks as follows:

// -V::XXX – A message explaining why this warning is suppressed

Here XXX is the warning number.

I think it's crucial to write the explanation; otherwise, it's impossible to understand why the warning is suppressed. Is it suppressed because the warning is false or because it annoys the programmer, who could not understand the issue?

Suppress all warnings for a folder only in the current project

Here an xml file is used (I usually name it pvs_settings.xml). This file travels with the project.

The example:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ApplicationSettings xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <!-- Import settings (mostly exclude paths) from global settings -->
  <AutoSettingsImport>true</AutoSettingsImport>
  <PathMasks>
    <!-- Exclude this paths from analysis -->
    <string>\cmsis\</string>
    <string>\spl\</string>
  </PathMasks>
  <!-- Disable 64-bit errors -->
  <Disable64BitAnalysis>true</Disable64BitAnalysis>
</ApplicationSettings>

Suppress a class of warnings for the current project

Here the ignore_warnings.pvsconfig file is used. This file travels with the project too. Of course, we welcome messages explaining why the warning is ignored!

The example:

###### Common warnings

# ignore 64-bit warnings
// -V::4

# allow C-style cast for primitive integer types (and void)
// -V:int:2005
// -V:char:2005
// -V:short:2005
// -V:uint8_t:2005
// -V:int8_t:2005
// -V:uint16_t:2005
// -V:int16_t:2005
// -V:uint32_t:2005
// -V:int32_t:2005
// -V:uint64_t:2005
// -V:int64_t:2005
// -V:void:2005

# ignore 'The body of the statement should be enclosed in braces';
# that doesn't look like a source of errors for us
// -V::2507 

###### MISRA

# ignore MISRA C++ 6-6-5
# 'A function should have a single point of exit at the end.'
# this goes againts our best practises and generally seems outdated
// -V::2506

Suppress specific folders on the computer

It is done with the help of xml files in the current user's folder. The local file must contain the <AutoSettingsImport>true</AutoSettingsImport> line, showing PVS-Studio that they must be used with the local xml file. PVS-Studio looks through the %APPDATA%\PVS-Studio\SettingsImports folder and applies all the files.

The example:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ApplicationSettings xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <PathMasks>
    <!-- Exclude this paths from analysis -->
    <string>\boost\</string>
    <string>\zlib\</string>
    <string>\png\</string>
    <string>\libpng\</string>
    <string>\pnglib\</string>
    <string>\freetype\</string>
    <string>\ImageMagick\</string>
    <string>\jpeglib\</string>
    <string>\libxml\</string>
    <string>\libxslt\</string>
    <string>\tifflib\</string>
    <string>\wxWidgets\</string>
    <string>\libtiff\</string>
    <string>\mesa\</string>
    <string>\cximage\</string>
    <string>\bzip2\</string>
  </PathMasks>
</ApplicationSettings>

Let's sum it up

It's possible to integrate PVS-Studio into Keil, however all the solutions are not perfect and require some manual enhancements.

I've been using PVS-Studio for several years now. I am satisfied because I feel protected from my own stupidity :)

I must admit that it's difficult to evaluate the benefits of constant analysis because any error is fixed almost immediately after the analyzer issues the corresponding warning. It's complicated to estimate the time I would have spent to find this issue without PVS-Studio.

It's worth noting that the analyzer slows down the build, so sometimes I disable it – for example, during furious debugging when I have to constantly change some coefficient in a single line.

There are some questions that I should have asked myself before starting the integration:

  • Wouldn't it be easier to integrate into Eclipse?
  • Wouldn't it be easier to integrate into CI, rather than into the IDE?
  • Maybe I could have developed a reflex "there's a bug — it's a holiday today, run PVS, and think about it later".

Here are some examples on github.

Popular related articles
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: Dec 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
The Last Line Effect

Date: May 31 2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: Oct 16 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: Jan 30 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: Jan 17 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
Static analysis as part of the development process in Unreal Engine

Date: Jun 27 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Unreal Engine continues to develop as new code is added and previously written code is changed. What is the inevitable consequence of ongoing development in a project? The emergence of new bugs in th…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: Apr 14 2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: Jul 31 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…
Technologies used in the PVS-Studio code analyzer for finding bugs and potential vulnerabilities

Date: Nov 21 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

A brief description of technologies used in the PVS-Studio tool, which let us effectively detect a large number of error patterns and potential vulnerabilities. The article describes the implementati…

Comments (0)

Next comments
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept