To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
Bugs. Bugs Never Change

Bugs. Bugs Never Change

Apr 08 2015
Author:

What you have just opened is the article you should link to in your Twitter or post in your favorite programmer public. This will benefit both us and the open-source software community. We analyze open-source projects and help make them better to get programmers all over the world to learn about PVS-Studio. Meanwhile, we write interesting and helpful articles. The more people get to know about them, the more pleased we'll be doing that and the more projects we will check. Everyone profits - sounds great, doesn't it?

0314_Bugs_never_change/image1.png

The idea of analyzing open-source projects for the sake of promoting one's products isn't something we have invented. But nobody else does exactly what we do - publish detailed reports of our checks.

You can often see some project mentioned to have been analyzed by an X static analyzer. But these are usually just descriptive generalizations or a mix of the analyzer's warnings and diff output. It's not interesting to read hollow ads. Reports about fixes done in the code are not informative for people unfamiliar with it, either, and so they are of little help in understanding what the bug is about.

We are no lazybones. We try to describe the error in every detail, explain how to fix it and avoid it if possible. Here are the results of our work over the many years:

Updatable list of articles where we tell our readers about the bugs found by PVS-Studio in open-source projects.

Reading our articles is not only interesting but also useful. Even experienced programmers can learn from them about new bug patterns and dark corners of the C++ language.

To make it interesting, we prefer well-known programs. For example, you can learn about bugs found in the code of the following projects:

  • CoreCLR
  • LibreOffice
  • Qt
  • Clang
  • Chromium

We do not write about every single project we have checked: Some of them are too small or have too few interesting bugs. But we always report these bugs to the project authors and add the errors into our bug database. This base can be used as a source of inspiration for many articles (example). So we do recommend that you use this resource to pick bug samples when preparing presentations, articles, books, or when developing coding standards.

We wish you bugless code! Keep track of new checks by following us in Twitter: @Code_Analysis.

Popular related articles
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: Oct 16 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: Jul 31 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
Static analysis as part of the development process in Unreal Engine

Date: Jun 27 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Unreal Engine continues to develop as new code is added and previously written code is changed. What is the inevitable consequence of ongoing development in a project? The emergence of new bugs in th…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: Jan 30 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: Jan 17 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
The Last Line Effect

Date: May 31 2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
Technologies used in the PVS-Studio code analyzer for finding bugs and potential vulnerabilities

Date: Nov 21 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

A brief description of technologies used in the PVS-Studio tool, which let us effectively detect a large number of error patterns and potential vulnerabilities. The article describes the implementati…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: Apr 14 2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…
How PVS-Studio Proved to Be More Attentive Than Three and a Half Programmers

Date: Oct 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

Just like other static analyzers, PVS-Studio often produces false positives. What you are about to read is a short story where I'll tell you how PVS-Studio proved, just one more time, to be more atte…

Comments (0)

Next comments
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept