To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (a basic version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Free PVS-Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
Verifying projects utilizing Marmalade …

Verifying projects utilizing Marmalade SDK with PVS-Studio analyzer

Mar 19 2012
Author:

Marmalade SDK (which was previously called AirPlaySDK) is a cross-platform SDK which allows the development of multi-platform applications for such mobile platforms, as iOS, Android, Symbian and several others.

Marmalade SDK supports the development inside Visual Studio IDE by generating regular Visual C++ project files. However, such projects do not call cl.exe, the Visual C++ compiler, directly. Instead, they utilize a special wrapper (also named cl.exe) which is added to the PATH variable through IDE settings (for Visual Studio versions prior to 2010) or project settings (for Visual Studio 2010 and later versions) VC++ Directories/Executable Directories. In turn, this wrapper calls the native Visual C++ compiler, appending and/or modifying several compilation arguments defined inside Visual C++ project in the process.

But to verify source files, the PVS-Studio analyzer calls the preprocessor (cl.exe or clang) directly. PVS-Studio receives its' required compilation arguments straight from project files through the IDE API which leads to compilation errors in case one of such Marmalade SDK generated project files is being verified because SDK header files do require the definitions which are included in its' compiler wrappers.

As a workaround to check Marmalade SDK projects with PVS-Studio, the project's compilation arguments could be modified manually by including some of these wrapper arguments into them. To prevent potential conflicts when compiling the project afterwards, it is preferable to create a separate build configuration in the Configuration Manager for this project (for example, Debug_PVS_Studio, by duplicating the Debug configuration). These changes should be made to this new configuration:

  • Adding the /X compiler argument (Ignores the standard include directory)
  • Adding the define symbol __S3E_CL_WRAPPER
  • Renaming the define symbol I3D_ARCH_ARM into the I3D_ARCH_X86

Before launching PVS-Studio, it is advised to set the preprocessing mode as 'Visual C++' (PVS-Studio->Options->Common Analyzer Settings->Preprocessor).

Popular related articles
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: Apr 14 2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: Dec 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: Oct 16 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
Characteristics of PVS-Studio Analyzer by the Example of EFL Core Libraries, 10-15% of False Positives

Date: Jul 31 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

After I wrote quite a big article about the analysis of the Tizen OS code, I received a large number of questions concerning the percentage of false positives and the density of errors (how many erro…
The Last Line Effect

Date: May 31 2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
Technologies used in the PVS-Studio code analyzer for finding bugs and potential vulnerabilities

Date: Nov 21 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

A brief description of technologies used in the PVS-Studio tool, which let us effectively detect a large number of error patterns and potential vulnerabilities. The article describes the implementati…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
How PVS-Studio Proved to Be More Attentive Than Three and a Half Programmers

Date: Oct 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

Just like other static analyzers, PVS-Studio often produces false positives. What you are about to read is a short story where I'll tell you how PVS-Studio proved, just one more time, to be more atte…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: Jan 17 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
The way static analyzers fight against false positives, and why they do it

Date: Mar 20 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

In my previous article I wrote that I don't like the approach of evaluating the efficiency of static analyzers with the help of synthetic tests. In that article, I give the example of a code fragment…

Comments (0)

Next comments
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept