To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (standard version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
One of the Answers to the Question &quo…

One of the Answers to the Question "Who Needs All that Parallelism at All?"

Dec 25 2009
Author:

One can often find discussions on the net that multicore processors, as well as parallelism, are needless, and all this is tricks of one (two or three) companies, which need to sell new processors.

I will not appeal to everyone "loving" parallelism, I will just tell about parallel applications helping software developers.

When multicore processors started to appear, software development tools generally did not support the new possibilities in paralleling. The question is not about paralleling programs done by a developer but about development tools themselves.

The compiler worked as a consecutive application, compiling the user program file by file. The code analyzer processed the source code file by file, trying to find errors in it. The build system (make) executed one task after another.

Luckily for ordinary developers, the creators of development systems realized quite soon how parallelism can help the users of their systems.

In the build system make, a command "-j" (or "-jobs") was added; it allows to execute commands in a parallel way.

Our code analyzer PVS-Studio fully supports work on multicore machines. This means that during work on an eight core machine, the analysis will run on all the cores. Parallelism in the analyzer is implemented due to parallel processing of several files. With this, the developer can always set the used number of cores in the analyzer settings. E.g., on an eight core machine, one can use only six cores for the analysis, and continue work with the two remaining cores without waiting for the tool to finish.

The possibility of first compiling the projects in a parallel way was added to the development environment Microsoft Visual Studio 2005, and later, in 2008 version, the possibility of compiling files separately was added (option /MP). Well, Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 users remember the number of broken copies when IntelliSense module appeared in this version. The topic about disabling IntelliSence has 120 000 views in MSDN forum. That is all because on a single core machine, this technology worked not at its best, and slowed down the work quite seriously. However, with the appearance of multicore machines, all these discussions died away. IntelliSence works on one core and does not disturb anyone.

If, to speed up the compilation, earlier one had to use various outside tools such as MPCL or IncrediBuild, now all this is integrated into development tools.

0041_One_of_the_Answers_to_the_Question_Who_Needs_All_that_Parallelism_at_All/image1.png

E.g., this figure of an overloaded machine with eight cores was done right during PVS-Studio analyzer running.

Thus, most developers welcomed the forthcoming of parallelism support in development tools. But why - most, and not all? Just because with the forthcoming of parallel compilation of a large project, one has to drink tea much faster than previously :-) .

Popular related articles
Technologies used in the PVS-Studio code analyzer for finding bugs and potential vulnerabilities

Date: Nov 21 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

A brief description of technologies used in the PVS-Studio tool, which let us effectively detect a large number of error patterns and potential vulnerabilities. The article describes the implementati…
The way static analyzers fight against false positives, and why they do it

Date: Mar 20 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

In my previous article I wrote that I don't like the approach of evaluating the efficiency of static analyzers with the help of synthetic tests. In that article, I give the example of a code fragment…
The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything

Date: Apr 14 2016

Author: Andrey Karpov

Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort. The au…
The Evil within the Comparison Functions

Date: May 19 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

Perhaps, readers remember my article titled "Last line effect". It describes a pattern I've once noticed: in most cases programmers make an error in the last line of similar text blocks. Now I want t…
PVS-Studio for Java

Date: Jan 17 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

In the seventh version of the PVS-Studio static analyzer, we added support of the Java language. It's time for a brief story of how we've started making support of the Java language, how far we've co…
PVS-Studio ROI

Date: Jan 30 2019

Author: Andrey Karpov

Occasionally, we're asked a question, what monetary value the company will receive from using PVS-Studio. We decided to draw up a response in the form of an article and provide tables, which will sho…
The Last Line Effect

Date: May 31 2014

Author: Andrey Karpov

I have studied many errors caused by the use of the Copy-Paste method, and can assure you that programmers most often tend to make mistakes in the last fragment of a homogeneous code block. I have ne…
Free PVS-Studio for those who develops open source projects

Date: Dec 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

On the New 2019 year's eve, a PVS-Studio team decided to make a nice gift for all contributors of open-source projects hosted on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket. They are given free usage of PVS-Studio s…
Appreciate Static Code Analysis!

Date: Oct 16 2017

Author: Andrey Karpov

I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis even though I am one of the developers of PVS-Studio analyzer myself. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be sma…
How PVS-Studio Proved to Be More Attentive Than Three and a Half Programmers

Date: Oct 22 2018

Author: Andrey Karpov

Just like other static analyzers, PVS-Studio often produces false positives. What you are about to read is a short story where I'll tell you how PVS-Studio proved, just one more time, to be more atte…

Comments (0)

Next comments

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept