Examples of errors detected by the V634 diagnostic
V634. Priority of '+' operation is higher than priority of '<<' operation. Consider using parentheses in the expression.
Haiku Operation System
V634 The priority of the '*' operation is higher than that of the '<<' operation. It's possible that parentheses should be used in the expression. RAW.cpp 1141
void
DCRaw::_WaveletDenoise()
{
....
for (i = 0; i < (1 << dim * 2); i++) { // <=
if (fimg[i] < -fThreshold)
fimg[i] += fThreshold;
else if (fimg[i] > fThreshold)
fimg[i] -= fThreshold;
else
fimg[i] = 0;
}
....
}
Similar errors can be found in some other places:
- V634 The priority of the '*' operation is higher than that of the '<<' operation. It's possible that parentheses should be used in the expression. RAW.cpp 1099
CryEngine V
V634 The priority of the '*' operation is higher than that of the '<<' operation. It's possible that parentheses should be used in the expression. model.cpp 336
enum joint_flags
{
angle0_locked = 1,
....
};
bool CDefaultSkeleton::SetupPhysicalProxies(....)
{
....
for (int j = 0; .... ; j++)
{
// lock axes with 0 limits range
m_arrModelJoints[i]....flags |= (....) * angle0_locked << j;
}
....
}
System Shock
V634 The priority of the '-' operation is higher than that of the '<<' operation. It's possible that parentheses should be used in the expression. FRCLIP.C 256
#define span_right(y,s) \
(x_span_lists[((y)<<SPAN_SHIFT)+(s<<1)+SPAN_RIGHT])
void fr_span_parse(void)
{
....
if (....span_right(y,(*cur_span_cnt)-1)....)>frpipe_dist)
....
....
}
Stellarium
V634 The priority of the '*' operation is higher than that of the '<<' operation. It's possible that parentheses should be used in the expression. StelHips.cpp 271
HipsTile* HipsSurvey::getTile(int order, int pix)
{
....
if (order == orderMin && !allsky.isNull())
{
int nbw = sqrt(12 * 1 << (2 * order));
....
}
....
}
What the programmer must have really meant is this: int nbw = sqrt(12 * (1 << 2 * order));
Qemu
V634 The priority of the '*' operation is higher than that of the '<<' operation. It's possible that parentheses should be used in the expression. nand.c 310
static void nand_command(NANDFlashState *s)
{
....
s->addr &= (1ull << s->addrlen * 8) - 1;
....
}
Snort
V634 The priority of the '*' operation is higher than that of the '<<' operation. It's possible that parentheses should be used in the expression. bug34427.c 160
int process_val(const u_int8_t *data, u_int32_t data_len,
u_int32_t *retvalue, ....) {
*retvalue = 0;
....
/* Now find the actual value */
for (; i < data_len; i++) {
*retvalue += data[i] * PM_EXP2(8 * (data_len - i - 1));
}
return(0);
}
#define PM_EXP2(A) 1 << A
DPDK
V634 The priority of the '/' operation is higher than that of the '<<' operation. It's possible that parentheses should be used in the expression. test_common.c 221
#define MAX_NUM 1 << 20
static int
test_align(void)
{
....
for (p = 1; p <= MAX_NUM / 2; p++) { // <=
for (i = 1; i <= MAX_NUM / 2; i++) { // <=
val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p);
if (val % p != 0 || val < i)
FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL", i, p);
val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p);
if (val % p != 0 || val > i)
FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR", i, p);
val = RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR(i, p);
if (val % p != 0 || ((val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_CEIL(i, p))
& (val != RTE_ALIGN_MUL_FLOOR(i, p))))
FAIL_ALIGN("RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR", i, p);
}
}
....
}
Similar errors can be found in some other places:
- V634 The priority of the '/' operation is higher than that of the '<<' operation. It's possible that parentheses should be used in the expression. test_common.c 222