Our website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience.
Accept
to the top
close form

Fill out the form in 2 simple steps below:

Your contact information:

Step 1
Congratulations! This is your promo code!

Desired license type:

Step 2
Team license
Enterprise license
** By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement
close form
Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
Free PVS‑Studio license for Microsoft MVP specialists
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
To get the licence for your open-source project, please fill out this form
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
I am interested to try it on the platforms:
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

close form
check circle
Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you do not see the email in your inbox, please check if it is filtered to one of the following folders:

  • Promotion
  • Updates
  • Spam

Webinar: Evaluation - 05.12

>
>
Why does not Visual C++ support the inl…

Why does not Visual C++ support the inline assembler for Intel 64 and IA-64 anymore?

Oct 30 2010
Author:

Giving up the support of the inline assembler code (through the key word __asm) when compiling applications for the 64-bit platforms Intel 64 and IA-64 is most probably related to the wish of the Microsoft company to simplify the optimizer's work and development of new versions of the compiler for Visual C++. Inline assembler code limits portability of software being developed while optimization by its means is rarely reasonable nowadays since the compiler creates rather efficient code most times.

When the functionality you need cannot be implemented by means of the C++ code, use intrinsic functions to replace assembler fragments or link external asm-files to the project.

References

Popular related articles


Comments (0)

Next comments next comments
close comment form