To get a trial key
fill out the form below
Team License (standard version)
Enterprise License (extended version)
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Request our prices
New License
License Renewal
--Select currency--
USD
EUR
GBP
RUB
* By clicking this button you agree to our Privacy Policy statement

** This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Message submitted.

Your message has been sent. We will email you at


If you haven't received our response, please do the following:
check your Spam/Junk folder and click the "Not Spam" button for our message.
This way, you won't miss messages from our team in the future.

>
>
>
Examples of errors detected by the V502…

Examples of errors detected by the V502 diagnostic

V502. Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the 'foo' operator.


Grid Control Re-dux

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. GridCtrlDemoDlg.cpp 1115


void CGridCtrlDemoDlg::UpdateMenuUI()
{
  ....
  GetMenu()->CheckMenuItem(IDC_HORZ_LINES, MF_BYCOMMAND |
    (bHorzLines)? MF_CHECKED: MF_UNCHECKED);
  GetMenu()->CheckMenuItem(IDC_LISTMODE, MF_BYCOMMAND |
    (m_Grid.GetListMode())? MF_CHECKED: MF_UNCHECKED);
  GetMenu()->CheckMenuItem(IDC_VERT_LINES, MF_BYCOMMAND |
    (bVertLines)? MF_CHECKED: MF_UNCHECKED);
  GetMenu()->EnableMenuItem(IDC_SINGLESELMODE, MF_BYCOMMAND |
    (m_Grid.GetListMode())? MF_ENABLED: MF_DISABLED|MF_GRAYED);
  ....
  GetMenu()->CheckMenuItem(ID_HIDE2NDROWCOLUMN,
    MF_BYCOMMAND |
    (m_bRow2Col2Hidden)? MF_CHECKED: MF_UNCHECKED);
  ....
}

This code is incorrect as the priority of '?:' operator is lower than of '|'. The program works correctly because of MF_BYCOMMAND == 0. Nonetheless this code is potentially dangerous.


FCEUX

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. fceux memwatch.cpp 711


static BOOL CALLBACK MemWatchCallB(....)
{
  ....
  EnableMenuItem(memwmenu, MEMW_FILE_SAVE,
    MF_BYCOMMAND | fileChanged ? MF_ENABLED:MF_GRAYED);
  ....
}

It works because of sheer luck, since #define MF_BYCOMMAND 0x00000000L.


IPP Samples

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. vm vm_file_win.c 393


vm_file* vm_file_fopen(....)
{
  ....
  mds[3] = FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL |
           (islog == 0) ? 0 : FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING;
  ....
}

0 is always written into mds[3]. Parentheses should be used: mds[3] = FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL | ((islog == 0) ? 0 : FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING).


Newton Game Dynamics

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '*' operator. physics dgminkowskiconv.cpp 1061


dgInt32 CalculateConvexShapeIntersection (....)
{
  ....
  den = dgFloat32 (1.0e-24f) *
        (den > dgFloat32 (0.0f)) ?
          dgFloat32 (1.0f) : dgFloat32 (-1.0f);
  ....
}

Similar errors can be found in some other places:

  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '*' operator. physics dgminkowskiconv.cpp 1081

Chromium

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '-' operator. views custom_frame_view.cc 400


static const int kClientEdgeThickness;

int height() const;

bool ShouldShowClientEdge() const;

void CustomFrameView::PaintMaximizedFrameBorder(
  gfx::Canvas* canvas)
{
  ....
  int edge_height = titlebar_bottom->height() -
    ShouldShowClientEdge() ? kClientEdgeThickness : 0;
  ....
}

OTS

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. ots gdef.cc 278


bool version_2;

bool ots_gdef_parse(....)
{
  ....
  const unsigned gdef_header_end = static_cast<unsigned>(8) +
    gdef->version_2 ? static_cast<unsigned>(2) :
                      static_cast<unsigned>(0);
  ....
}

ReactOS

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. uniata id_dma.cpp 1610


VOID NTAPI
AtapiDmaInit(....)
{
  ....
  ULONG treg = 0x54 + (dev < 3) ? (dev << 1) : 7;
  ....
}

The "0x54 + (dev < 3)" condition is always true. This is the correct code: ULONG treg = 0x54 + ((dev < 3) ? (dev << 1) : 7).


Chromium

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. rtp_rtcp rtp_receiver_video.cc 480


WebRtc_Word32
RTPReceiverVideo::ReceiveH263Codec(....)
{
  ....
  if (IP_PACKET_SIZE < parsedPacket.info.H263.dataLength +
       parsedPacket.info.H263.insert2byteStartCode ? 2:0)
  ....
}

Parentheses should be used.

Similar errors can be found in some other places:

  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. rtp_rtcp rtp_receiver_video.cc 504

MongoDB

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '<<' operator. version.cpp 107


string sysInfo() {
  ....
  stringstream ss;
  ....
  ss << (sizeof(char *) == 8) ? " 64bit" : " 32bit";
  ....
}

A very nice sample. 0 or 1 will be printed instead of "32bit"/"64bit".


TinyCAD

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. ruler.cpp 66


BOOL hasOrigin;

void Ruler::OnNewSize(CRect nSize)
{
  ....
  Size = CRect(Size.left + hasOrigin ? RULER_WIDTH : 0,
               Size.top, Size.right, Size.top + RULER_WIDTH);
  ....
}

Apache Xerces Project

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '*' operator. contentspecnode.cpp 262


int ContentSpecNode::getMaxTotalRange() const {
  ....
  int max
  int maxFirst;
  int maxSecond;
  ....
  max = max * (maxFirst > maxSecond) ? maxFirst : maxSecond;
  ....
}

Unreal Engine 4

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. materialshared.h 224


class FUniformExpressionSet : public FRefCountedObject
{
  ....
  uint32 GetAllocatedSize() const
  {
    return UniformVectorExpressions.GetAllocatedSize()
      + UniformScalarExpressions.GetAllocatedSize()
      + Uniform2DTextureExpressions.GetAllocatedSize()
      + UniformCubeTextureExpressions.GetAllocatedSize()
      + ParameterCollections.GetAllocatedSize()
      + UniformBufferStruct
          ?
          (sizeof(FUniformBufferStruct) +
           UniformBufferStruct->GetMembers().GetAllocatedSize())
          :
          0;
  }
  ....
};

Wine Is Not an Emulator

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. url.c 767


static HRESULT WINAPI Protocol_Start(....)
{
  ....
  ok(size == no_callback ? 512 : 13, "size=%d\n", size);
  ....
}

Similar errors can be found in some other places:

  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. string.c 1086
  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. string.c 1111
  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. reader.c 761
  • And 2 additional diagnostic messages.

Miranda NG

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. TabSRMM controls.cpp 451


#define MF_BYCOMMAND 0x00000000L

void CMenuBar::updateState(const HMENU hMenu) const
{
  ....
  ::CheckMenuItem(hMenu, ID_VIEW_SHOWAVATAR,
    MF_BYCOMMAND | dat->bShowAvatar ? MF_CHECKED : MF_UNCHECKED);
  ....
}

This code is incorrect as the priority of '?:' operator is lower than of '|'. The program works correctly because of MF_BYCOMMAND == 0. Nonetheless this code is potentially dangerous.

Similar errors can be found in some other places:

  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. TabSRMM hotkeyhandler.cpp 307
  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. MRA mrapopup.cpp 289
  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. CmdLine utils.cpp 92
  • And 6 additional diagnostic messages.

Haiku Operation System

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '-' operator. AbstractLayout.cpp 244


bool IsVisible(bool ancestorsVisible) const
{
  int16 showLevel = BView::Private(view).ShowLevel();
  return (showLevel - (ancestorsVisible) ? 0 : 1) <= 0;
}

Haiku Operation System

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '&&' operator. fnmatch.c 58


#define FOLD(c) \
  ((flags & FNM_CASEFOLD) && ISUPPER ((unsigned char) (c)) \
  ? tolower ((unsigned char) (c)) \
  : (c))

Computational Network Toolkit

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. sequenceparser.h 338


enum SequenceFlags
{
    seqFlagNull = 0,
    seqFlagLineBreak = 1, // line break on the parsed line
    seqFlagEmptyLine = 2, // empty line
    seqFlagStartLabel = 4,
    seqFlagStopLabel = 8
};

long Parse(....)
{
  ....
  // sequence state machine variables
  bool m_beginSequence;
  bool m_endSequence;
  ....
  if (seqPos)
  {
    SequencePosition sequencePos(numbers->size(), labels->size(),
      m_beginSequence ? seqFlagStartLabel : 0 | m_endSequence ?
      seqFlagStopLabel : 0 | seqFlagLineBreak);
    // add a sequence element to the list
    seqPos->push_back(sequencePos);
    sequencePositionLast = sequencePos;
  }

  // end of sequence determines record separation
  if (m_endSequence)
      recordCount = (long) labels->size();
  ....
}

FreeBSD Kernel

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. ata-serverworks.c 166


static int
ata_serverworks_chipinit(device_t dev)
{
  ....
  pci_write_config(dev, 0x5a,
           (pci_read_config(dev, 0x5a, 1) & ~0x40) |
           (ctlr->chip->cfg1 == SWKS_100) ? 0x03 : 0x02, 1);
  }
  ....
}

FreeBSD Kernel

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. in6.c 1318


void
in6_purgeaddr(struct ifaddr *ifa)
{
  ....
  error = rtinit(&(ia->ia_ifa), RTM_DELETE, ia->ia_flags |
        (ia->ia_dstaddr.sin6_family == AF_INET6) ? RTF_HOST : 0);
  ....
}

Similar errors can be found in some other places:

  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '&' operator. if_bwn.c 10838
  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. zap_micro.c 500

OpenToonz

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. igs_motion_wind_pixel.cpp 127


void rgb_to_lightness_(
  const double re, const double gr, const double bl, double &li)
{
  li=((re < gr) ? ((gr < bl) ? bl : gr) : ((re < bl) ? bl : re) +
                            (gr < re)
                          ? ((bl < gr) ? bl : gr)
                          : ((bl < re) ? bl : re)) / 2.0;
}

Open X-Ray Engine

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '*' operator. hudsound.cpp 108


void HUD_SOUND_ITEM::PlaySound(HUD_SOUND_ITEM&     hud_snd,
                                const Fvector&     position,
                                const IGameObject* parent,
                                bool               b_hud_mode,
                                bool               looped,
                                u8                 index)
{
  ....
  hud_snd.m_activeSnd->snd.set_volume(
    hud_snd.m_activeSnd->volume * b_hud_mode?psHUDSoundVolume
                                            :1.0f);
}

Similar errors can be found in some other places:

  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. uihudstateswnd.cpp 487
  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. uicellcustomitems.cpp 106

OpenJDK

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. method.hpp 249


int method_size() const
  { return sizeof(Method)/wordSize + is_native() ? 2 : 0; }

CryEngine V

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. gpuparticlefeaturespawn.cpp 79


bool HasDuration() { return m_useDuration; }

void CFeatureSpawnRate::SpawnParticles(....)
{
  ....
  SSpawnData& spawn = pRuntime->GetSpawnData(i);
  const float amount = spawn.amount;
  const int spawnedBefore = int(spawn.spawned);
  const float endTime = spawn.delay +
                        HasDuration() ? spawn.duration : fHUGE;
  ....
}

GCC

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '<=' operator. dwarf2out.c 2053


static void
output_loc_operands (dw_loc_descr_ref loc, int for_eh_or_skip)
{
  unsigned long die_offset
    = get_ref_die_offset (val1->v.val_die_ref.die);
  ....
  gcc_assert (die_offset > 0
        && die_offset <= (loc->dw_loc_opc == DW_OP_call2)
             ? 0xffff
             : 0xffffffff);
  ....
}

Linux Kernel

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '|' operator. core.c 1046


static int nvme_pr_preempt(struct block_device *bdev,
                           u64 old, u64 new,
                           enum pr_type type, bool abort)
{
  u32 cdw10 = nvme_pr_type(type) << 8 | abort ? 2 : 1;
  return nvme_pr_command(bdev, cdw10, old, new,
                         nvme_cmd_resv_acquire);
}

Scilab

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. sci_sparse.cpp 49


types::Function::ReturnValue sci_sparse(....)
{
  bool isValid = true;
  ....
  for (int i = 0 ; isValid && i < in.size() ; i++)
  {
    switch (in[i]->getType())
    {
      case types::InternalType::ScilabBool :
      case types::InternalType::ScilabSparseBool :
      {
        isValid = (i == (in.size() > 1) ? 1 : 0);
      }
  ....
}

Amazon Lumberyard

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. zipencryptor.cpp 217


bool ZipEncryptor::ParseKey(....)
{
  ....
  size_t pos = i * 2 + (v1 == 0xff) ? 1 : 2;
  RCLogError("....", pos);
  return false;
  ....
}
size_t pos = i * 2 + (v1 == 0xff ? 1 : 2);

Amazon Lumberyard

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '-' operator. 3dengine.cpp 1898


float C3DEngine::GetDistanceToSectorWithWater()
{
  ....
  return (bCameraInTerrainBounds && (m_pTerrain &&
          m_pTerrain->GetDistanceToSectorWithWater() > 0.1f)) ?
          m_pTerrain->GetDistanceToSectorWithWater() :
          max(camPostion.z - OceanToggle::IsActive() ?
          OceanRequest::GetOceanLevel() : GetWaterLevel(), 0.1f);
}
camPostion.z - OceanToggle::IsActive() ? .... : ....

Similar errors can be found in some other places:

  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '-' operator. scriptbind_ai.cpp 5203
  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '+' operator. qcolumnwidget.cpp 136
  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '&&' operator. shapetool.h 98

Perl 5

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '-' operator. toke.c 9494


STATIC char *
S_scan_ident(pTHX_ char *s, char *dest, STRLEN destlen, I32 ck_uni)
{
  ....
  if ((s <= PL_bufend - (is_utf8)
                          ? UTF8SKIP(s)
                          : 1)
        && VALID_LEN_ONE_IDENT(s, PL_bufend, is_utf8))
  {
    ....
  }
  ....
}
s <= PL_bufend - (is_utf8) ? UTF8SKIP(s) : 1

Perl 5

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. re_exec.c 9193


STATIC I32
S_regrepeat(pTHX_ regexp *prog, char **startposp, const regnode *p,
            regmatch_info *const reginfo, I32 max _pDEPTH)
{
  ....
  assert(STR_LEN(p) == reginfo->is_utf8_pat ? UTF8SKIP(STRING(p)) : 1);
  ....
}

Similar errors can be found in some other places:

  • V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. re_exec.c 9286

NCBI Genome Workbench

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '&&' operator. ncbi_connutil.c 1135


static const char* x_ClientAddress(const char* client_host,
                                   int/*bool*/ local_host)
{
  ....
  if ((client_host == c  &&  x_IsSufficientAddress(client_host))
      ||  !(ip = *c  &&  !local_host
            ? SOCK_gethostbyname(c)
            : SOCK_GetLocalHostAddress(eDefault))
      ||  SOCK_ntoa(ip, addr, sizeof(addr)) != 0
      ||  !(s = (char*) malloc(strlen(client_host) + strlen(addr) + 3))) {
      return client_host/*least we can do :-/*/;
  }
  ....
}

LLVM/Clang

V502 [CWE-783] Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. PPCTargetTransformInfo.cpp 404


int PPCTTIImpl::getVectorInstrCost(unsigned Opcode, Type *Val, unsigned Index) {
  ....
  if (ISD == ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT && Index == ST->isLittleEndian() ? 1 : 0)
    return 0;
  ....
}

Heawei Ark Compiler

V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' operator. mir_parser.cpp 884


enum Opcode : uint8 {
  kOpUndef,
  ....
  OP_intrinsiccall,
  OP_intrinsiccallassigned,
  ....
  kOpLast,
};

bool MIRParser::ParseStmtIntrinsiccall(StmtNodePtr &stmt, bool isAssigned) {
  Opcode o = !isAssigned ? (....)
                         : (....);
  auto *intrnCallNode = mod.CurFuncCodeMemPool()->New<IntrinsiccallNode>(....);
  lexer.NextToken();
  if (o == !isAssigned ? OP_intrinsiccall : OP_intrinsiccallassigned) {
    intrnCallNode->SetIntrinsic(GetIntrinsicID(lexer.GetTokenKind()));
  } else {
    intrnCallNode->SetIntrinsic(static_cast<MIRIntrinsicID>(....));
  }
  ....
}

This website uses cookies and other technology to provide you a more personalized experience. By continuing the view of our web-pages you accept the terms of using these files. If you don't want your personal data to be processed, please, leave this site.
Learn More →
Accept