# V8019\. Two or more equivalent expressions are specified inside the case expression list\.

The analyzer detected equivalent expressions for the same case within the switch statement\.

The example:

```cpp
switch {
  case s == "start", s == "start":
    Start()
  case s == "stop":
    Stop()
}
```

Using equivalent expressions like`s == "start"` makes no sense\.

* If the first expression evaluates to `true`, control flow enters the branch, bypassing the second expression\.
* If the first expression evaluates to `false`, the second expression will evaluate the same way, and control flow will skip this entire branch\.

Most likely, this is a typo, and the second equivalent expression should be something else\.

The fixed code:

```cpp
switch {
  case s == "start", s == "begin":
    Start()
  case s == "stop":
    Stop()
}
```